Michael Rome, JD
This article is not a substitute for consulting with legal counsel in your State regarding the specific fact situation.
This marks the fourth installment in a series for Board members about commonly
faced questions and issues. Many of these challenges require a combination of legal,
political, and practical solutions. Hopefully these articles will assist Board members in
determining what is in the best interest of the Association.
Sometimes there is confusion between the powers held by a committee and the
powers held by a board of directors. The first thing to keep in mind is that the general
purpose of every committee is to assist the Board in its execution of duties and
responsibilities. This principle is contained in the Georgia Nonprofit Corporation Act and
Roberts Rules of Order.
The board is the body elected by the homeowners to take actions on behalf of the
association. Any authority on the part of a committee can only come from the governing
documents or by delegation of the board.
One of the issues occasionally confronted by a board is how to deal with a rogue
committee. Perhaps the committee believes it no longer has to answer to the board, or is
exercising control never granted to it. In some extreme examples, the committee may
take the position it is no longer subject to the board or the association.
In the context of community associations, some committees are given authority
over a particular area. The most common is the Architectural Control Committee
(“ACC”)…sometimes called the Architectural Review Committee. The ACC is usually
granted jurisdiction over the approval process for applications by homeowners to modify
the house or Lot. In addition, they are sometimes given the responsibility of creating
and/or changing the architectural guidelines.
Even so, it is the board who appoints the ACC, and it is the Board who can
remove an ACC member…including the chairperson. Boards need to understand that if
they have the power to appoint, they also have the power to remove. (In rare
circumstances the covenants will require that the ACC be elected by the homeowners, in
which case, the board could not remove an ACC member.)
The power to remove an ACC member gives the Board ultimate control over the
committee. In fact, the governing documents do not typically prohibit the board from
appointing itself as the ACC, and in many small communities it is common for the board
to act as the ACC.
Some associations avoid the issue of rogue committees by requiring a board
member to serve as the chairperson. Another alternative is to mandate there be a liaison
from board who attends the committee meetings, but does not vote. The issue of a
committee out of control is not just a philosophical dilemma because the board is
ultimately responsible for the actions of a committee.
Download Article as PDF | Download Adobe Acrobat Reader
Rome & Associates P.C.
707 Whitlock Ave., Suite E-15 Marietta, GA 30064 map